AI Agents & Agentic AI

Agents that do the work, not just answer questions

Most companies now have a chatbot. Far fewer have software that can actually complete a task: pull the order, check the policy, issue the refund, log the ticket. That second thing is what we build.

8+
Years building software
500+
Projects delivered
50+
Engineers on staff
What we build

Agents with real permissions

An agent is only useful when it can reach your systems and act in them. Every engagement starts with the tools it needs and the boundaries it must respect.

Customer support agents

Deflect tier-1 volume properly, reading order history, applying your refund policy, and escalating with full context when it should not decide alone.

Sales & research agents

Account research, lead enrichment, proposal drafting and CRM hygiene, running continuously against your pipeline instead of on a rep's to-do list.

Back-office automation

Invoice matching, order exceptions, data entry between systems that were never designed to talk. The work nobody wants and everybody pays for.

Tool & systems integration

MCP servers, function calling and API layers that give an agent safe, typed access to your ERP, CRM, helpdesk, warehouse and internal services.

Multi-agent workflows

For work too big for one context: a coordinator that decomposes the job, specialists that handle each part, and a verifier that checks the result before it ships.

RAG & knowledge systems

Retrieval over your documents, tickets and code that returns the right passage, with the chunking, reranking and evaluation work that makes it reliable.

How we keep it honest

The part demos skip

Getting an agent to work once is a weekend. Getting it to work on the thousandth run, on the inputs you did not anticipate, is the actual engagement.

Evaluation before launch

A test set built from your real cases, scored on every change. You see the pass rate before it reaches a customer, not after.

Guardrails and limits

Spend caps, scoped credentials, allowlisted actions and a human checkpoint on anything irreversible. Agents get the narrowest permissions that still work.

Full traceability

Every run logged: inputs, tool calls, decisions, cost. When something goes wrong you can see exactly where, which is the difference between a fixable system and a black box.

Cost you can predict

Token and inference spend modelled per workflow up front, then monitored. No surprise invoice at the end of month one.

How we start

From idea to production in one quarter

01

Pick the workflow

Two weeks of discovery on your actual operations. We find the process with high volume, clear rules and a measurable cost, and tell you plainly if you do not have one yet.

02

Build and evaluate

A working agent against your real systems in a sandbox, scored on a test set from your own history. You approve the pass rate before anything goes live.

03

Deploy and widen

Live on a slice of traffic with a human in the loop, then progressively more autonomy as the numbers hold. Expansion is earned, not assumed.

Stack

What we build with

Models
ClaudeGPTGeminiLlamaOpen-weight / self-hosted
Agent tooling
MCPTool / function callingLangGraphVercel AI SDKTemporal
Retrieval
pgvectorPineconeWeaviateElasticsearchHybrid search
Runtime
AWSGCPAzureKubernetesServerless
FAQ

Questions we get asked

A chatbot produces text. An agent takes actions: it calls your APIs, reads and writes records, and works through a multi-step task until it is done or it hits a boundary you set. The engineering difference is mostly in what surrounds the model: tool access, permissions, retries, evaluation and logging.
A scoped first workflow typically reaches production in eight to twelve weeks: roughly two weeks of discovery, four to six weeks of build and evaluation, then a staged rollout. Broader multi-agent programmes run longer, but we deliberately ship one working workflow before expanding.
No. We work inside your cloud account and your data boundaries by default. Where regulation or policy requires it, we deploy open-weight models on infrastructure you control so nothing leaves your environment.
It will sometimes, so the system is designed for that. Irreversible actions route to a human, every run is logged and replayable, and the evaluation suite catches regressions before deployment. The goal is a known, measured error rate that beats the process it replaced, not an imagined perfect one.
Yes, and it is usually the better outcome. We can build alongside your team and hand over with documentation and training, or run the system ourselves. Being dependent on us is not a goal we design for.

Have a process in mind? Let's pressure-test it

Tell us the workflow you would most like to stop doing manually. We will tell you honestly whether an agent is the right answer, and what it would take.

Book a scoping call

Reviews

Clutch
5.0
Upwork
5.0
Google
5.0
Freelancer
5.0